. ©MAZAL LIBRARY

NMT08-T0552


. NUERNBERG MILITARY TRIBUNAL
Volume VIII · Page 552
Previous Page Home PageArchive
Table of Contents - Volume 8
  TRANSLATION OF
DOCUMENT NI-7569
PROSECUTION EXHIBIT 477
 
LETTER FROM DEFENDANT KRAUCH TO KEHRL, 13 JANUARY 1944, CONCERNING THE EFFORTS OF THE KRAUCH OFFICE IN THE PROCUREMENT OF FOREIGN LABOR, PRISONERS OF WAR, INMATES OF CONCENTRATION CAMPS, AND RELATED MATTERS 
 
18 January 1944 
 
Distribution: 
  1. Addressee  CK/G 
  2. Professor Krauch  1364/43 
  3. Dr. Ritter  Your letter dated 22 December 1943 
  4. Lt. Colonel Kirschner
5. Labor Allocation   
Your reference: RoA [Raw Materials Department] 00/22.2 
  6. Dr. Adolf Mueller  Labor Allocation 
 
To the Chief of the Raw Materials Office in the Reich Ministry for Armaments and War Production, President Kehrl
Berlin-Wannsee, Am Sandwerder 23

Dear President Kehrl,*

In your letter, dated 22 December 1943, you pointed out the importance of close cooperation between your office and mine with particular reference to the allocation of labor. Of course I fully agree with your point of view. It is most gratifying to find that your officials are giving strong support at the Armaments Office to my applications for manpower for the execution of tasks formulated in close agreement with your planning office. The aims of your Raw Materials Office are identical with the endeavors of my office: to ensure that the chemical factories under my supervision attain the highest possible level of production and that factories under construction are completed and equipped as soon as possible.

Only my office, however, is in a position to deal with the distribution of labor allocated for the various sectors under my supervision, or with the allocation to individual works of manpower demands made by the Wehrmacht, because this requires detailed information about the plan as a whole and the position in individual factories.

I was not aware of any misunderstandings or even mistakes which are supposed to have occurred in the course of negotiations conducted in the past directly between my office and the Armaments Office; should matters of any importance be involved I should be obliged if you could let me have further details.

May I be allowed to point out, however, that the efforts of my
__________
* Hans Kehrl was a defendant in the Ministries Case. Kehrl was chief of the Planning Office of the Central Planning Board, chief of the Planning Office of the Reich Ministry for Armaments and War Production, and chief of the Office of Raw Materials in the Reich Ministry of Armaments and War Production. See vols. XII-XIV, this series.
 
552
Next Page NMT Home Page