. ©MAZAL LIBRARY

NMT08-T0721


. NUERNBERG MILITARY TRIBUNAL
Volume VIII · Page 721
Previous Page Home PageArchive
Table of Contents - Volume 8
salary fluctuations and general social welfare questions, for orientation of the Vorstand members interested in these questions.

DR. DIX: I want to make one remark with regard to the translation, to avoid any misunderstanding. The translation of “social policy” is correct; one could as well say “social welfare.”

Q. To what extent was it customary in Farben, within the regulation of the law that I read to you, for you to give directives and instructions?

A. According to the law, I had to issue directives insofar as my predecessor and I had reserved the right to do this, and to the extent that this corresponded with practice and the rule in Farben.

Q. These were in the fields that you have sketched?

A. Yes.

Q. In what fields did you not give these directives?

A. In the field of state social welfare policy.

Q. What did that include?

A. State social insurance, local salary and wage rate questions, the general working conditions as set forth in the local plant regulations, and above all the hiring and employment of workers.

Q. Who was competent for that?

A. The local plant leader was responsible for that.

Q. What is the reason for this regulation?

A. This plant leader, who worked in the plant and who was familiar with it, was, according to the law regulating national labor, to have the principal responsibility for local conditions. Agreement had been achieved on this in Farben always.

Q. What is the reason that in the fields of state social welfare, for instance labor commitment, you did not issue any directives? What is the deeper reason for that?

A. Because these things were set down and managed by the local and provincial state authorities, such as for instance the insurance agencies, the trustee of labor, the regional labor offices, and the local labor offices. The entire enterprise of Farben — and therefore I — could not intervene at all in these local conditions.

Q. This practice existed earlier, didn’t it?

A. Yes, this condition was already in existence when I became main plant leader.

Q. That was before the war. Perhaps the reasons were somewhat different?

A. No, not at all. Nothing changed in these things when the war broke out.

Q. If you learned, however, Dr. Schneider, that in some field of social welfare something was not quite in order, what did you then have to do?  

 
721
Next Page NMT Home Page