. ©MAZAL LIBRARY

NMT08-T0731


. NUERNBERG MILITARY TRIBUNAL
Volume VIII · Page 731
Previous Page Home PageArchive
Table of Contents - Volume 8
4. TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANT AMBROS 
 
EXTRACTS FROM TESTIMONY OF
DEFENDANT AMBROS* 
 
DIRECT EXAMINATION 
 
* * * * * * * * * * 
 
DR. HOFFMANN (Counsel for Defendant Ambros): Mr. Ambros, we left off yesterday at the Rattwitz plant. Would you please, quite briefly, explain once more what brought the construction of this plant about and why it was stopped?

A. I said that the requirements for rubber in Germany in 1938 amounted to approximately 100 to 120 thousand tons. I also said that the production of buna had been projected to an amount of 70 thousand tons, so that a deficit of at least 30 thousand tons existed. When the war had broken out, the Reich Government decided, approximately in October 1939, to produce this deficit of approximately 30 thousand tons in a third plant and that third plant was Rattwitz.

Q. What happened to Rattwitz? Was the construction concluded?

A. The construction of Rattwitz, which began about in April of 1940, was stopped on 7 July 1940, after the French campaign had been closed.

Q. Did you yourself stop construction of this plant? Did you get a government order to do it, or how was it done?

A. The instruction to stop construction could not be given by us as the private entrepreneur. This regulation had to come, in the final analysis, from the person responsible for all building construction in Germany, and that was Mr. Todt. He had a picture of the strength and the possibilities of the construction industry in Germany and he could determine whether a certain building should be concluded and he also determined, as was the case at Rattwitz, that it should be terminated on 7 July 1940.
 
* * * * * * * * * *  
 
Q. Now. Mr. Ambros, please tell me, after Rattwitz had been stopped, did that conclude the construction of a third buna plant or was that matter taken up again later?

A. No. Three months later, we were again called to Berlin so as to start constructing the third plant then. It seemed contradictory to us that in July, a buna plant should be stopped, and in September 
__________
* Further extracts from the testimony of defendant Ambros are reproduced in sections V B4, VII G7b, K6 , vol. VII, this series, and in sections VIII D4, E4, IX F4.
 
731
Next Page NMT Home Page