. ©MAZAL LIBRARY

NMT08-T0911


. NUERNBERG MILITARY TRIBUNAL
Volume VIII · Page 911
Previous Page Home PageArchive
Table of Contents - Volume 8
“Fellow-citizens, we cannot escape history. We of this Congress and this administration will be remembered in spite of ourselves. No personal significance or insignificance can spare one or another of us. The fiery trial through which we pass will light us down, in honor or dishonor, to the latest generation.'”¹ 
 
 
C. Closing Statement for Defendant Krauch² 
 
DR. BOETTCHER (counsel tinsel for defendant Krauch): Your Honors: We have come to the end of a trial the type and extent of which may be characterized as unique. By submitting 6,545 documents, in more than 15,000 pages of transcript, on 140 days in session, by hearing 188 witnesses, we have struggled to get at the bottom of things.

Now it is time to sum up the result, with all lie application befitting the seriousness of the matter and the dignity of the court, and also for the defense to contribute its share to the legal findings and — as it was once expressed in this trial — to help “to get us out of the wood.”

What then is the result?

It is customary in this trial that the case of the defense begins with an opening statement.³ This places the defense under the obligation to correlate the results of its case with this opening statement and to answer the question which worries counsel day and night: Was not too much said, too much promised in the opening statement? Did we succeed in our case in fulfilling the claims made in the opening statement? Dr. Krauch submitted to direct examination by this court and to cross-examination by the prosecution. Did he pass the test, thus questioned face to face? Within the time limits set by the Tribunal, which may be explained by the special circumstances of this trial, my final plea will only be able to give a blue print — if I may characterize it with a German expression often chosen for scientific work — of only the broad outlines of the viewpoint of the defense with regard to Dr. Krauch’s case.

All the details are laid down in the final brief ,4 which had been drawn up in such a manner as to enable the Tribunal to obtain infor- [...mation]
__________
¹ “Annual Message to Congress, 1 December 1862,” The Life and Writings of Abraham Lincoln, edited by Philip van Doren Stern (The Modern Library, New York, 1942), page 745.
² Mimeographed transcript, 2 June 1948, pages 14600-14634.
³ The opening statement for Defendant Krauch Is reproduced in vol. VII, section III C.
4 In addition to the closing statements, both the prosecution and defense submitted final briefs in the Farben case. The closing statements, even though they were read orally in open court, were also submitted in writing, so that translations could be made in advance and thus assure a more literal treatment of quotations, citations, and similar matters than would be possible by the usual system of simultaneous interpretation of court proceedings. See volume XV, section VII, “Handling of Language Problems Arising Because of the Bilingual Or Multilingual Nature of the Nuernberg Trials.”
 
 
911
Next Page NMT Home Page