. ©MAZAL LIBRARY

NMT08-T0933


. NUERNBERG MILITARY TRIBUNAL
Volume VIII · Page 933
Previous Page Home PageArchive
Table of Contents - Volume 8
Thus I come to the conclusion of my discussion of the various facts, offered both by the prosecution and the defense, with regard to counts one to three. In summarizing, I arrive at the following result: Dr. Krauch doesn’t belong at all in this dock.

As I have already proved, he obviously no longer had any close connection with I. G. Farben after 1936. Thus, there was no basis to indict Dr. Krauch in connection with I. G. Farben.

Nor was there any reason to make him a defendant because of his honorary position in the government economic organization, since his position was far below the level which is of interest to the Nuernberg Tribunals. In the IMT the defendants were Cabinet members and specially outstanding confidants of Hitler. Dr. Krauch by no means belonged to this category.

In the so-called Ministries case (Case 11) there is no place for Dr. Krauch among the defendants, since these are only high government officials, the lowest being Under State Secretary [Unterstaatssekretaer] a rank which Dr. Krauch did not reach by far.64a

The correctness of that conclusion is also evident from the fact that none of the other plenipotentiaries general — with the exception of Sauckel, who, as was shown, held a special position — was indicted, although a number of them64b held actual powers, in contrast to Dr. Krauch.

IV. To round off the picture which I was permitted to present to the Tribunal, it is only necessary to discuss a few points about Krauch the man. In line with his attitude of reserve, he refused in direct examination to say anything on this subject. It thus was left to the defense to prove his humane attitude by introducing a number of documents This was done by explaining his attitude towards Jews and half-Jews,65 whom he saved from persecution by the Nazis, whom he helped with the full weight of his personality. Undaunted, he held to the Church and its institutions, although this might have led to persecution in the Third Reich.66 Moved with emotion, renowned scientists described how he defended the freedom of science against strong adverse Party tendencies, how he also stood up for persons who had fallen in disfavor with the Nazi regime.67 He did all this by taking advantage of his honorary position, without which such comprehensive assistance would have been impossible altogether. And finally, we have proved a number of facts which I find essential when evaluating Krauch, the man. Dr. Krauch was one of the few who, when he heard of the humiliating treatment of concentration camp inmates, had the courage in the face of personal danger to offer re- [...sistance]
__________
64a TZ 118.
64b TZ 48a.
65 TZ 9b.
66 TZ 9c.
67 TZ 9a.  
 
933
Next Page NMT Home Page