. ©MAZAL LIBRARY

NMT08-T1123


. NUERNBERG MILITARY TRIBUNAL
Volume VIII · Page 1123
Previous Page Home PageArchive
Table of Contents - Volume 8
below that of the production of synthetic rubber. We cannot assume, in the absence of more specific evidence, that the failure of the United States to develop the production of synthetic rubber was due to the withholding of information by Farben.

In the field of propaganda, intelligence, and espionage, we find that there was activity on the part of Farben's agents with reference to industrial and commercial matters. German industry and the superiority of German goods were advertised and extolled. Some praise of the German Government appeared from time to time, but we cannot reach the conclusion that the advertising campaigns of Farben were essentially for the purpose of emphasizing Nazi ideology. Neither do we give great significance to the fact that the agents were instructed to avoid advertising in journals hostile to Germany. Such advertising policy would seem compatible with business judgment arid would be without political significance. The so-called espionage activities of the Farben agents were confined to commercial matters. These agents from time to time reported to Farben information obtained with regard to industrial and commercial development in fields of Farben business interests, particularly with regard to competitors. There is no evidence of reports concerning military or armament matters. Some of the information received by Farben from its agents was turned over to the Reich officials. The evidence clearly shows that Farben was constantly under pressure to gather and furnish to the Reich information concerning industrial developments and production in foreign countries. Farben’s reluctance to comply, even to the full extent of information actually received, indicates a lack of cooperation which negatives participation in a conspiracy or knowledge of plans on the part of Hitler to wage aggressive war.

We have discussed the defendant Krauch, who held certain official positions with both Farben and the Reich; the defendant Schmitz, who was chairman of the Vorstand; the defendant von Schnitzler, who was the leading man in the commercial group of Farben; and the defendant ter Meer, who was the foremost technical expert and who also exerted considerable influence in the administration of affairs of the organization. In each instance we find that they, in more or less important degrees, participated in the rearmament of Germany by contributing to her economic strength and the production of certain basic materials of great importance in the waging of war. The evidence falls far short of establishing beyond a reasonable doubt that their endeavors and activities were undertaken and carried out with the knowledge that they were thereby preparing Germany for participation in an aggressive war or wars that had already been planned either generally or specifically by Adolf Hitler and his immediate circle of Nazi civil and military fanatics.  

 
1123
Next Page NMT Home Page