. ©MAZAL LIBRARY

NMT08-T1131


. NUERNBERG MILITARY TRIBUNAL
Volume VIII · Page 1131
Previous Page Home PageArchive
Table of Contents - Volume 8
[de...] fendant with reference to property located in Poland, France, Alsace-Lorraine, Norway, and Russia.

The Law Applicable to Plunder and Spoliation

The pertinent part of Control Council Law No. 10, binding upon this Tribunal as the express law applicable to the case, is Article II, paragraph (1), subsection (b), which reads as follows:  
 
"Each of the following acts is recognized as a crime: 
* * * * * * * * * * 
 
“(b) War Crimes. Atrocities or offences against persons or property constituting violations of the laws or customs of war, including but not limited to, murder, ill treatment or deportation to slave labour or for any other purpose, of civilian population from occupied territory, murder or ill treatment of prisoners of war or persons on the seas, killing of hostages, plunder of public or private property, wanton destruction of cities, towns or villages, or devastation not justified by military necessity.” (Emphasis supplied.) 
This quoted provision corresponds to Article G, section (b) of the Charter of the IMT, concerning which that Tribunal held that the criminal offenses so defined were recognized as war crimes under international law even prior to the IMT Charter. There is consequently no violation of the legal maxim nullum crimen sine lege involved here. The offense of plunder of public and private property must be considered a well-recognized crime under international law. It is clear from the quoted provision of the Control Council Law that if this offense against property has been committed, or if the proof establishes beyond reasonable doubt the commission of other offenses against property constituting violations of the laws and customs of war, any defendant participating therein with the degree of criminal connection specified in the Control Council Law must be held guilty under this charge of the indictment.

Insofar as offenses against property are concerned, a principal codification of the laws and customs of war is to be found in the Hague Convention of 1907 and the annex thereto, known as the Hague Regulations.

The following provisions of the Hague Regulations are particularly pertinent to the charges being considered:  
 
“Art. 46. Family honor and rights, individual lives and private property, as well as religious convictions and practice, must be respected. Private property cannot be confiscated.

“ Art. 47. Pillage is formally prohibited. 
* * * * * * * * * * 
 
"Art. 52. Neither requisition in kind nor services can be demanded from communes or inhabitants except for the necessities of the

 
1131
Next Page NMT Home Page