. ©MAZAL LIBRARY

NMT08-T1197


. NUERNBERG MILITARY TRIBUNAL
Volume VIII · Page 1197
Previous Page Home PageArchive
Table of Contents - Volume 8
of war crimes or crimes against humanity connected with the war, or who had been personally implicated as members of said organization in the commission of such crimes. Specifically excluded from the classes of members to which the Tribunal imputed criminality, however, were those persons who were drafted into membership by the state in such a way as to give them no choice in the matter and who had committed no such crimes, and those persons who had ceased to belong to any of said organizations prior to 1 September 1939.

The IMT said: 
 
“A criminal organization is analogous to a criminal conspiracy in that the essence of both is cooperation for criminal purposes. There must be a group bound together and organized for a common purpose. The group must be formed or used in connection with the commission of crimes denounced by the Charter. Since the declaration with respect to the organizations and groups will, as has been pointed out, fix the criminality of its members, that definition should exclude persons who had no knowledge of the criminal purposes or acts of the organization and those who were drafted by the State for membership, unless they were personally implicated in the commission of acts declared criminal by Article 6 of the Charter as members of the organization. Membership alone is not enough to come within the scope of these declarations.”¹
Finally, the IMT made certain recommendations, from which we quote: 
 
"Since declarations of criminality which the Tribunal makes will be used by other courts in the trial of persons on account of their membership in the organizations found to be criminal, the Tribunal feels it appropriate to make the following recommendations:
* * * * * * * * * * 
 
“2. Law No. 10, to which reference has already been made, leaves punishment entirely in the discretion of the trial court even to the extent of inflicting the death penalty.

“The de-Nazification Law of 5 March 1946, however, passed for Bavaria, Greater-Hesse, and Wurttemberg-Baden, provides definite sentences for punishment in each type of offense. The Tribunal recommends that in no case should punishment imposed under Law No. 10 upon any members of an organization or group declared by the Tribunal to be criminal exceed the punishment fixed by the de-Nazification Law. No person should be punished under both laws.”³
For having actively engaged in the National Socialistic tyranny in the SS, the de-Nazification Law of 5 March 1046, for Bavaria. Greater- [Hesse]
________
1. Trial of the Major War Criminals, volume I, page 256.
2. Ibid., page. 256 and 257.  

 
1197
Next Page NMT Home Page