. ©MAZAL LIBRARY

NMT09-T0157


. NUERNBERG MILITARY TRIBUNAL
Volume IX · Page 157
Previous Page Home PageArchive
Table of Contents - Volume 9
materials. His activity as Plenipotentiary for Conversion in the exchange of metals during 1942-1943 can be elucidated by testimony of one of his colleagues.

Contrary to a charge by the prosecution, he never held high government office. He never played an important role in industry apart from the fact that at home and abroad he was known as a great scientist.

On account of his neutral position in the management of the central steel office and the research division, and ability, Professor Houdremont after 1939 was entrusted with the task of mediating occasionally between the various factions in the field of raw materials and power management. Prior to April 1943, when he took over the management of the Huettenwerke he was not connected with production nor was he actually in charge of any workers. At that time, and this is true to an increasing degree for the period June-July 1944 when in addition he took over the tool plants, and for September 1944 when he became plant leader, all questions concerning the procurement of labor from a variety of sources were answered by basic government decisions. No individual could change the course of events, just as little as he could have made the Mississippi disappear into its source just before the estuary. As will be further shown Professor Houdremont was sick from December 1943 until June 1944 and during this decisive period when with the approaching end of the war conditions became chaotic he was 500 kilometers away from his office and confined to his sickbed. It will be the task of my colleagues to present details concerning the situation of the labor allocation and the chaotic conditions in general. I shall confine myself to introducing evidence for those facts which characterize the basic attitude of my client. It was always known that he insisted on decent and humane treatment. In addition, his closest collaborators can testify that reports on maltreatment of workers were never submitted or related to him, still less that he approved of or tolerated them. This appears credible from the very fact that they had to pass through the various channels of worker, section-leader, foreman, chief foreman, assistant plant leader, group leader, plant director, director of the Friedrich Krupp, and member of the Vorstand in technical questions. Although as an internationally renowned scientist he was accustomed to sit together with his professional colleagues from all countries in peaceful collaboration, he avoided on purpose visiting a single factory in any of the countries occupied by Germany despite his technical interest and his linguistic knowledge, and still less did he participate in any so-called spoliation. I have to stress this explicitly since I have taken it upon myself to deal within the  

 
157
Next Page NMT Home Page