. ©MAZAL LIBRARY

NMT09-T0204


. NUERNBERG MILITARY TRIBUNAL
Volume IX · Page 204
Previous Page Home PageArchive
Table of Contents - Volume 9
During the same 3 years in which these events occurred, the American prosecution charged leading German industrialists with having spoliated the occupied territories during the war, although the prosecution was quite aware that the actions of German industrialists in the occupied territories cannot be compared both in kind and extent with the actions in occupied Germany.

At the present time I do not wish to say anything with reference to the personality of my client Karl Eberhardt. The Tribunal will be able to form a judgment itself during the trial, and will realize that he is a man who did his duty, and can in no way be compared to a criminal, which the prosecution wishes to make of him and the other persons of the Krupp firm. According to the statements of the prosecution he is not incriminated with any matters which lay outside the sphere of his activity in the firm Krupp. Whether, however, he committed criminal acts within the sphere of his activity in Krupp, will be shown by the presentation of evidence. At the moment I only wish to quote a sentence uttered by the prosecution, which at the beginning of the opening statement said: “Today the name ‘Krupp’ is freighted with associations and preconceptions.”

I am afraid the prosecution belongs to that circle of people who are victims of such preconceptions loyal to their principles, namely, to see a criminal in every German industrialist just because fate made him a German industrialist, who both before and during the war fulfilled his duty.
 
J. Opening Statement for the Defendant Korschan* 
 
DR. WANDSCHNEIDER: I now read the opening statement for my client, Dr. Korschan.

The charges made on the basis of Control Council Law No. 10 consist of two groups of offenses which vary according to their significance and order of importance. Counts one and four form the starting point and nucleus of the indictment; that is to say, the participation in a common conspiracy for the commission of crimes against peace and the direct participation in these crimes, that is, in aggressive wars. The most encompassing charge is that of a common conspiracy which, according to the indictment, comprises all other counts, one, two, and three. The war crimes against humanity which have been charged in the indictment are designated as means for a purpose, that purpose being “to support Germany in the conduct, preparation, and institution of further aggressive wars” (German Tr. p.30), and they only
__________
* Opening statement is recorded in mimeographed transcript, 28 March 1948. pp. 4816 4821.  
 
204
Next Page NMT Home Page