. ©MAZAL LIBRARY

NMT09-T0209


. NUERNBERG MILITARY TRIBUNAL
Volume IX · Page 209
Previous Page Home PageArchive
Table of Contents - Volume 9
without even attempting to adduce any proof of the risk he ran by attending these meetings and discussions.

The exposition of these relations between industry and Party which I have undertaken to make hardly concerns any of the defendants. It could confidently have been left to historical research to adduce the facts; and the necessity of burdening this trial could thus have been avoided.

The program of the Nazi Party, so the prosecution claims, coincided with the endeavors of the firm of Krupp to build up again a mighty Germany, with Krupp as the focal point of the armaments industry. The main points of that program are alleged to have been reprehensible. In this connection the prosecution choose to attack above all the doctrine of “living space” although that word does not occur in the Party program, but they pass over in silence the fact that points one and two of the Party program postulate self determination and equal rights for all nations, postulates which had figured prominently during the First World War in the 14 Points of President Wilson. In its stead the prosecution mentions as a special point in the program of the NSDAP, a statement which I have been unable to discover therein to the effect that war was a noble and necessary activity of Germans, and goes on to state that “the name, prestige, and financial support of Krupp was used to bring the NSDAP into power over Germany and to put into effect its announced program.” *

This statement of the prosecution represents a certain advance compared with the allegations made in earlier industrial trials. In other trials the prosecution went so far as to claim I quote from various of the indictments “Krupp, Flick, Thyssen, and a few others had persuaded the industrialists in 1938 to support them; Beck, Fritsch, Rundstedt, and other typical militarists dominated the military clique. Supported by these groups Hitler seized power, and having seized power he embarked on conquest.” In this trial the prosecution have refrained from invoking that unholy trinity, because, apparently, they were incapable of taking it seriously themselves. Small wonder, since they made the fatal mistake of conjuring up as Mephistophelean powers, apart from the naughty industrialists, the Generals Beck and Freiherr von Fritsch, who were alleged to have put Hitler in the saddle. The prosecution should have known then, and do, it may be surmised, know today, that Beck was cold shouldered as a staunch opponent of Hitlerism long before the war broke out and that he was shot on 20 July, and that Fritsch who had become involved in the disgusting machinations directed against him by
__________
* Indictment. p. 12

9034320 — 51 — 15.  
 
209
Next Page NMT Home Page