. ©MAZAL LIBRARY

NMT09-T0226


. NUERNBERG MILITARY TRIBUNAL
Volume IX · Page 226
Previous Page Home PageArchive
Table of Contents - Volume 9
V. ORGANIZATION OF THE KRUPP CONCERN
AND THE POSITIONS OF THE DEFENDANTS
 
A. Introduction  
 
The judgment of the Tribunal (sec. XI), in its early part, gives a concise description of the history and organization of the Krupp concern. In its opening statement, the prosecution asserted that the practical management of the Krupp firm “was handled by the members of the Krupp Vorstand and their principal deputies. In 1939, there were three Vorstand members: the defendants Alfried Krupp and Loeser, and the deceased Paul Goerens * * * The other ten defendants occupied responsible positions under the three Vorstand members. Seven of them [Eberhardt, Houdremont, Ihn, Janssen, Korschan, Mueller, and Pfirsch] in 1939 held the title of ‘Deputy Director’.”

From 1903 until December 1943, the Krupp firm was incorporated under German law as "Fried. Krupp Aktiengesellschaft.” “Aktiengesellschaft” (ordinarily abbreviated as “A.G.”) may be literally translated as “share company.” This form of business enterprise was ordinarily adopted by most large German business enterprises. An “A.G.” approximates in legal nature the American corporation. It has two governing boards, an “Aufsichtsrat” (supervisory board) and a “Vorstand” (managing board). Concerning these two governing bodies in the Krupp concern, the Tribunal stated in its judgment: “In practice the control of the whole Krupp concern was vested in the Vorstand * * *. The Aufsichtsrat * * * appears to have had the power to review the activities of the Vorstand. However, it met only once a year, and its functions were purely formal.”

In December 1943 the Krupp enterprise was converted to an unincorporated enterprise, solely owned by the defendant Alfried Krupp. An intrafirm circular at that time stated that the defendant Alfried Krupp “has the full responsibility and direction of the entire enterprise. To assist him he has appointed a board of business management with the name Das Direktorium [often referred to in the case as the Directorate]. The regular and deputy members of the former Vorstand (managing board), with the exception of Dr. Loeser, resigned, will hereafter be the regular and deputy members of the Direktorium. They will have authority to sign for the firm in place of the owner, and without an adjunct indicating a power of attorney [Prokura].” (Document NIK–9294, Pros. Ex. 42.) *
__________
* Reproduced below in section B.  
 
226
Next Page NMT Home Page