. ©MAZAL LIBRARY

NMT09-T0357


. NUERNBERG MILITARY TRIBUNAL
Volume IX · Page 357
Previous Page Home PageArchive
Table of Contents - Volume 9
1. that the arguments of the prosecution on count one which brings the charge of crimes against the peace and count four insofar as it charges participation in a common plan and a conspiracy to commit crimes against the peace are insufficient for a verdict of “guilty” to be passed;

2. that the defense need not reply to this argument of the prosecution;

3. that the defendants are not guilty in this respect.
 
II 
 
With this motion the defendants wish to contribute to a considerable speeding-up of the case.

With this motion the defendants intend to meet a request of the Court to restrict the presentation of evidence to important questions. After the conclusion of the prosecution's evidence they think they may say that the arguments of the prosecution will not suffice, for legal reasons alone, in respect of the points named in the motion under I, to convict the defendants, and that, therefore, a refutation by counterevidence is not required. 
 
III 
 
For a more detailed argument the defense refer to the document by Attorney Kranzbuehler submitted herewith.* Nuernberg, 11 March 1948  
 
Memorandum of Dr. Kranzbuehler, 11 March 1948, in Support
of the Defense Motion for an Acquittal on the Charges of
Crimes Against Peace 
 
  1. The prosecution accuses all the defendants:

a. Under count one.

“Of having committed crimes against peace by participating in the preparation of invasions of other countries and in wars of aggression in violation of international law and treaties under international law, including, but not restricted to the planning, preparation, initiation and waging of wars of aggression and wars in violation of international agreements and assurances.”

b. Under count four.

“Of having participated in the formulation or execution of a common plan or conspiracy to commit, or which involved the commission of, crimes against peace.”
 
The alleged actions of the defendants are said to represent violations of international law and crimes as defined in Article II of Control Council Law No. 10.
__________
* The memorandum follows.  
 
357
Next Page NMT Home Page