. ©MAZAL LIBRARY

NMT09-T0465


. NUERNBERG MILITARY TRIBUNAL
Volume IX · Page 465
Previous Page Home PageArchive
Table of Contents - Volume 9
Plan, announced by Hitler in September 1936, was in the words of Goering, "to create a foundation upon which preparation for war might be accelerated." Immediately the Krupp firm undertook to build a synthetic fuel plant. Through the export of war material the firm procured foreign exchange and raw materials. An essential part of the Nazi plan for aggression was the remilitarization and fortification of the Rhineland. On 7 March 1936, in defiance of the Versailles Treaty, the demilitarized zone of the Rhineland was entered by German troops. The Krupp firm, which as early as 1933 had begun working on fortifications, was asked to take a substantial part in the construction of the West Wall. According to a Krupp report, this construction would not have been possible without its assistance (NI-764, Pros. Ex. 467) :¹
 
“Fortifications for the border defense line (cupolas and casemates) of latest construction were first developed by Krupp after the war. The experience gained thereby served as a basis for the organization of the present system of fortification. It would have been impossible to carry out the required tasks had Krupp not been able to fall back upon its experience in the manufacture of armor plate and upon its foundries.”
 
On 1 September 1939 the invasion of Poland touched off the Second World War. Every effort continued to be bent, as previously toward cooperating to the fullest extent possible with the Nazi government program. As a report prepared by Krupp in 1942 shows, their contributions to the program of conquest had already been substantial (NIK-10499, Pros. Ex. 491):²  
 
“The superiority of German weapons in the campaigns of the last 2 years, in the battles in the air and also on the sea, is at the same time the best proof of the achievements which Krupp attained in the field of armaments.

“The great fighting strength of the German artillery, the superiority of German tanks, especially the tank IV over those of the enemy, the performance of the 88mm. antiaircraft gun in support of other formations in attack as well as in defense against enemy tank attacks, the successes of the German Air Force and of the submarines, the fight of the battleship ‘Bismarck,’ speak clearly for the quality of these weapons, in the development of which Krupp played a decisive part.” 
 
In the light of the available evidence, the conclusion is inescapable that the Krupp firm under the leadership of Gustav Krupp
__________
¹ Ibid.
² Ibid.  
 

465
Next Page NMT Home Page