. ©MAZAL LIBRARY

NMT09-T0484


. NUERNBERG MILITARY TRIBUNAL
Volume IX · Page 484
Previous Page Home PageArchive
Table of Contents - Volume 9
Present were the following gentlemen: Dr. Flick, Dr. Kloeckner, Dr. Loeser, Luebsen, E. Poensgen, Tgahrt, Dr. Voegler, Zangen, Dr. Winkhaus.

I. Mr. Zangen,¹ gave an account of his conversation with Minister Funk.² a. Mr. Funk referred to the fact that he has given considerable assistance to business [Wirtschaft], particularly as regards the problem of taxation, and he now asked in return that he should receive assistance by a reasonable attitude in the future, and that care be taken that no excesses occur, which might give an opening to the opponents of private enterprise to make accusations against business; particularly one should seek now to repress all desire for annexation, etc.
 
* * * * * 
 
II. Minette — Mr. Poensgen gives a picture of the task Steinbrinck³ and discusses the situation in the several countries.

a. Holland — On Mr. Poensgen's suggestion the economic group adopted the attitude that the Ijmuiden Smelting Works cannot be usefully taken over. In that connection it was stated that the water piping used for the transformation of sea water into fresh water had been destroyed by the British, and that it would take at least one year to repair the plant. Also the entrance to the harbor was blocked by a sunken ship. He did not know if it was possible to transport ore inland.

b. Belgium — Those present took note of the sending-out of the Bulle Commission and of the future Schwede Mission. The unanimous tendency of those present was that one should avoid to break up works in Belgium. Those works should remain intact except for removal of individual pieces of machinery which were lacking here.

c. Luxembourg — In this connection information was received on previous discussions of Mr. Steinbrinck in Luxembourg, and of the appointment of Mr. Berve for ARBED4 and Mr. Meier for Differdange.

d. It is reported that confiscation commissions of the Wehrmacht have secured the supplies and in part are removing them. It is our unanimous opinion that the materials which have been
__________
¹ Zangen was chairman of the Vorstand of the Mannesmann-Roehren-Werke Duesseldorf, and president of the Reich Group Industry.
² Funk, Reich Minister of Economies, was a defendant in the case before the IMT. (Trial of the Major War Criminals, op. cit. supra, vol. I.)
³ At this time Steinbrinck was Plenipotentiary for the steel industry (Generalbenuftregter fuer die Stahlindustrie) in the occupied territories of northern France. Holland, Belgium, and Luxembourg. Previously Steinbrinck was a leading official in numerous Flick enterprises. He was a defendant in the Flick Case (United States vs. Friedrich Flick, et al., Case 5, Vol. VI).
4 Acleres Mures de Burbach-Eich-Dudelange, largest steel plant in Luxembourg.  

 
484
Next Page NMT Home Page