. ©MAZAL LIBRARY

NMT09-T0645


. NUERNBERG MILITARY TRIBUNAL
Volume IX · Page 645
Previous Page Home PageArchive
Table of Contents - Volume 9
A. I am director of the technical service of the ALSTHOM Société at Belfort.

Q. Since when have you been with that firm?

A. I joined the firm in 1921.

Q. And you are still there?

A. Yes, I am still there.

Q. Were you in Belfort at the time when the machine was taken away from there?

A. I was present, and I even witnessed this incident.

Q. Did you object to the taking away of that machine?

JUDGE WILKINS, Presiding: (to interpreter) Can you remember all that?¹

INTERPRETER: Yes, Sir.

WITNESS KOCH: Yes, we objected the same day and the main grounds were that this machine was the only one on which our whole manufacture in the boiler construction field was based, also for the manufacture of high-pressure tubes this machine was essential, and we also objected on the grounds that this machine was not at all used for military purposes.

MR. MANDELLAUB: Did you intend at any time to sell this machine?

WITNESS KOCH: No, we never had the intention of selling the machine. We even protested against the loss of this machine because the machine was part of our assets. We sold part of our production, but we would never have agreed to sell any part of our assets.

Q. Was it clear to you at the time that this was the firm of Krupp which was interested in this machine?

A. Yes.

Q. Please, would you pause at certain intervals in order to give the interpreter an opportunity to translate.

JUDGE WILKINS, Presiding: That would be better, yes.

WITNESS KOCH: Yes, we immediately realized that it was for Krupp, because an engineer of the Krupp Works, by the name of Eisfeld,² together with a German officer of the Armament Inspectorate of the Naval High Command, came to inspect the machine; and then a day later, German mechanics of the Krupp Works came and dismantled the machine and sent it to the Krupp factory in Rheinhausen. We heard only later that the machine was used for war production.

MR. MANDELLAUB: Formerly this machine was never used for war production?

A. No, never.
__________
¹ Judge Wilkins refers to the witness’ answer which begins, “Yes. we objected the same day ***.” The answer was first given in French and following Judge Wilkins’ interruption was interpreted in English.
² Eisfeld was the plant manager of the Krupp-Stahlbau Plant in Rheinhausen, Germany
.  
 
645
Next Page NMT Home Page