. ©MAZAL LIBRARY

NMT09-T0653


. NUERNBERG MILITARY TRIBUNAL
Volume IX · Page 653
Previous Page Home PageArchive
Table of Contents - Volume 9
had seen that the machines were going to Rheinhausen. We were big enough boys at that time to be able to read what it said on the freight cars. So it wasn’t a mere accident that we approached Director Schmidt and established the fact that our machines were at Rheinhausen and decided to address ourselves to Krupp.

DR. BEHLING: I have no further questions.
 
 
3. EXTRACTS FROM THE TESTIMONY OF DEFENSE WITNESS ERICH THIESS*  
 
DIRECT EXAMINATION 
 
* * * * * 
 
DR. WENDLAND (associate counsel for the defendant Loeser): Are you still working at Krupp’s today?

WITNESS THIESS: Yes.

Q. Where do you work?

A. Krupp-Stahlbau, Rheinhausen.

Q. What is your position?

A. Commercial manager.

Q. How long have you had this position?

A. Since 1 April 1941.

Q. In your activity as commercial manager of Stahlbau Rheinhausen, did you ever have anything to do with the dismantling of the sheet-metal-bending machine of the firm of ALSTHOM and the setting up of this machine at the firm of Stahlbau Rheinhausen?

A. With the dismantling and the setting-up, I had nothing to do, because it did not come within my sphere of activity.

Q. Did you conduct negotiations about the purchase of the machine by Krupp?

A. Yes. Yes, I did. During a later stage, after the technical experts had negotiated, I was asked to participate in the negotiations at the beginning of 1942.

Q. Did negotiations concerning the acquisition of the machine take place prior to that?

A. Yes.

Q. How did these first negotiations go?

A. As far as I am informed, our plant manager, Eisfeld, went to Belfort in the fall of 1941 in order to negotiate with the French about the possibility of the purchase.

Q. When was that?
__________
* Complete testimony is recorded in mimeographed transcript, 30 April and 1 May 1948, pp. 8407-6465.  
 
653
Next Page NMT Home Page