. ©MAZAL LIBRARY

NMT09-T0655


. NUERNBERG MILITARY TRIBUNAL
Volume IX · Page 655
Previous Page Home PageArchive
Table of Contents - Volume 9
[re…] member all the details. At the Economics and Armament Office —

Q. Would you give us the full name of this office you have been using in abbreviations?

A. It was the Economics and Armament Office with the military commander, France. Apart from the man in charge of this particular affair I also met the agent of the military commander with the ALSTHOM firm I think his name was Arnold but I am not quite sure, but as far as I remember his name was Arnold. And in a comparatively vague form we discussed the further course of the proceedings. I think we also discussed the evaluation; in this connection Mr. Arnold was in favor of a higher price, and the German authorities and we ourselves were in favor of a price fixed on the basis of the estimate.

Q. Did ALSTHOM demand any definite price at that time?

A. Not as far as I remember.

Q. Only they didn’t like the price that you were prepared to pay?

A. Well, I don’t quite remember whether at that time an offer had already been made or was discussed. At any rate the result of my visit was that we asked the High Command of the Navy in Berlin whether they would agree if we started negotiations with ALSTHOM on the basis of the evaluation by Mr. Simonis.

Q. Why did you ask the OKM about this?

A. Because the machine had been requisitioned by the OKM. In view of the letter from ALSTHOM dated June 1941 we had at the time inquired in Berlin whether we would be allowed to take up negotiations with that firm and had received the reply that we could do so but that we should keep Berlin informed.

Q. Was the OKM interested in the price that you would possibly pay?

A. The OKM was interested for two reasons: first of all on account of the compensation they would have to pay for the requisition, and secondly because that machine was supposed to do exclusively sheet-metal-bending operations for navy production, and the price for carrying out these sheet-metal-bending operations was to be fixed on the basis of the price that had been paid for the machine.

Q. In which way would the price you paid for the machine have influenced the price for the bending operations?

A. Mainly because of the depreciation rate and the rate of interest that had to be paid.

Q. Well, what happened then?

A. In the meantime, a parallel course had been taken in Paris, as the German authorities, and I think particularly the Economics and Armament Office, had passed on the evaluation by Mr. Simonis  

 
655
Next Page NMT Home Page