. ©MAZAL LIBRARY

NMT09-T0798


. NUERNBERG MILITARY TRIBUNAL
Volume IX · Page 798
Previous Page Home PageArchive
Table of Contents - Volume 9
1. I was, as far as I know, a regular member of the Krupp Direktorium since 1936, possibly only since 1937 or 1938, and this position of mine, as far as I am aware, ceased to exist on 31 December 1943, at the time when the corporation was transformed into a private company. I was chairman of the Direktorium from 1 April 1943 until 31 December 1943 (?) [sic]. During all this time, and also after 31 December 1943 (?), I normally participated in all conferences of the Direktorium held in a restricted or wider circle. Of course there were cases in which I was absent for some reason or other. From the foregoing it follows that during the war I was well informed regarding the basic attitude of the Direktorium towards the question of labor procurement, with particular reference to other than German labor or compulsory labor, and therefore can make the following statement in respect thereof. The Krupp Direktorium only against its will, that is to say, only due to the pressure of circumstances to be described later, put up with the fact that other than German workers, and especially nonvoluntary workers, had to be employed. These circumstances consisted, on the one hand, in a certain moral pressure exerted by the authorities in regard to an intensified production program and to the employment of non-German workers, and, on the other hand, in the fact that the normally available manpower resources became more and more inadequate and finally gave out completely. This inward objection referred to by me was expressed in the Direktorium as far as I know, for the first time when the first Russian prisoners of war were consigned to us. This was toward the end of 1941. The prisoners of war came to us at that time after a very short stay in the prisoner of war base camp, and often in a completely emaciated condition, probably due to the after effects of severe battles and to the abnormal conditions prevailing in the fighting area from which they came. Naturally we could not obtain from them the work output of a normal German worker. At the same time, I have to add that later this situation was changed, as the Russian prisoners of war, after a prolonged stay at the prisoner of war base camp, came to us in a better physical condition. Even when Russian civilian workers were assigned to us for the first time, which may have been the case during 1942, the Direktorium put up with this fact unwillingly. Mr. Loeser submitted a statement to the Direktorium, which showed that the employment of such foreign workers, considering the relative work output and the relative cost of the employment of this type of labor, were of no financial advantage to the firm of Krupp as compared with the employment of German workers. But it is not correct that Mr. Loeser was the only one, or the chief one, to express the attitude men- […tioned]  

 
798
Next Page NMT Home Page