. ©MAZAL LIBRARY

NMT09-T1080


. NUERNBERG MILITARY TRIBUNAL
Volume IX · Page 1080
Previous Page Home PageArchive
Table of Contents - Volume 9
When I pointed out that the Duesseldorf Regional Office would not accept these arguments, Mr. von Buelow promised to take the matter up with the firm’s executives. Both Mr. von Buelow and the directors of Krupp quite obviously put up a fight against the establishment of the special camp, and actually managed to postpone a final decision. I had to report on my discussion with Mr. von Buelow to the Duesseldorf Regional Office. Mr. von Buelow’s objections were dismissed, and again the immediate establishment of the special camp was demanded.

Yet the firm of Krupp put the matter off again, declaring that they still had no material. Thus they won a temporary delay, but Duesseldorf persisted. Some time later when I reported in reply to a new inquiry from Duesseldorf that Messrs. Krupp had not yet started to build the camp, I was instructed to tell Mr. von Buelow the following: All large firms in the Duesseldorf Regional Office district having complied with the request to establish special camps, it was now presumed that Messrs. Krupp refuse compliance on purpose, especially as they were the only large firm which had failed to date to obey the order. Should Krupp persist in this attitude, “State Police action” would be taken against the responsible persons. Only then did the erection of the special camp Dechenschule materialize. Its completion, however, was delayed for a considerable time, and only months after others had finished theirs, did the firm of Krupp, after further urging, finally complete its special camp.

I have carefully read the two pages of my affidavit and hereby affix to it my personal signature:
 
[Signed] NOHLES  
 
Nuernberg, 29 April 1948 
 
 
EXTRACTS FROM THE TESTIMONY OF DEFENSE WITNESS PETER NOHLES BEFORE COMMISSION II ¹ 
 
CROSS-EXAMINATION 
 
* * * * * * * 
 
MISS GOETZ: Wasn’t the Dechenschule camp² a camp for the punishment of slackers among domestic and indigenous workers?

WITNESS NOHLES; No, it was primarily intended for eastern workers.
__________
¹ Complete testimony is recorded in the mimeographed transcript 22 and 24 May 1948, pp. 9136-9210, 9301-9316. After Nohles had given his testimony and while the Krupp trial was continuing, he committed suicide in Nuernberg Prison.
² Nohles’ affidavit concerning the Dechenschule camp (von Buelow 542. Def. Ex. 1362) is reproduced immediately above.  
 

1080
Next Page NMT Home Page