. ©MAZAL LIBRARY

NMT09-T1324


. NUERNBERG MILITARY TRIBUNAL
Volume IX · Page 1324
Previous Page Home PageArchive
Table of Contents - Volume 9
formation of a party or a movement. One thing, however, formed, the rebellion arising from the human distress which increases as the work of people loses its meaning, because it must be performed under the irresistible compulsion of a presumptuous dictatorship which disregards the convictions of the personal conscience which has its source in God.

This need brought together clandestinely men and women from all circles of the population and forged them into an underground community which today we call the German resistance. The conspirators, generally speaking, knew and met each other only if they were close acquaintances for they had to be careful not to call attention to themselves and thus be caught.

The organizers and leaders of the resistance were anxious to fill positions which could offer them a secure platform as a starting point for the intended coup d’etat. As a matter of course they, as everyone else in Germany, were forced to consider their professional and political effectiveness as they existed in the Hitler regime. I, too, took the same path as these men. It culminated before the People’s Court. That the latter’s death sentence was not executed and that I am now standing here is more than a miracle.

DEFENDANT ALFRIED KRUPP: Mr. President, Your Honors. My codefendants have asked me when speaking the final words in this trial to do so on their behalf as well. When in 1943 I became the responsible bearer of the Krupp name and tradition, little did I anticipate that this legacy would one day bring me into the defendant’s dock, just as little as my associates anticipated when years and decades ago they joined a firm whose good reputation seemed unshakeable. And yet the name of Krupp was on the list of war criminals long before the end of the war, not because of the charges to which the prosecution is compiling against us now, but because of a notion which is as old as it is fallacious:

Krupp wanted war and Krupp made war.

You gentlemen of the Tribunal have recognized the notion for what it is, a misconception with some, with others a lie.

As a member of the fifth generation which produced steel, the fourth generation which forged weapons, I should like to add one thing. Never in my parents’ home nor in my family did I hear one word or experience one act which welcomed or promoted any war at any place or at any time. The symbol of our house does not depict a cannon, but three interlocked wheels, emblem of peaceful trade.

With the ruling acquitting Krupp from the responsibility for war, you have served the truth. The International Military Tribunal before which my father was indicted would have had to  

 
1324
Next Page NMT Home Page