. ©MAZAL LIBRARY

NMT09-T1328


. NUERNBERG MILITARY TRIBUNAL
Volume IX · Page 1328
Previous Page Home PageArchive
Table of Contents - Volume 9
identification. No document marked for identification has been considered unless it was one the contents of which justified us in taking judicial notice thereof.

Ordinance No. 7, referred to above, provides that affidavits shall be deemed admissible. Exercising its right to construe this ordinance, this Tribunal announced at the beginning of the trial that it would not consider any affidavit unless the affiant was made available for cross-examination or unless the presentation of the affiant for cross-examination had been waived, and this ruling has been strictly adhered to.

The Tribunal ruled to the effect that the contents of affidavits made by defendants would only be considered as evidence against the respective affiants and not as against any other defendant unless such affiant or affiants took the witness stand and became subject to cross-examination by the other defendants or their counsel. None of the defendants took the stand to testify upon the issues in this case, and hence such affidavits have only been considered in accordance with the ruling made.

The trial was conducted in two languages with simultaneous interpretations of German into English and English into German throughout the proceedings.

Final arguments of counsel have been concluded and briefs have been filed. Each defendant was given an opportunity to make a statement to the Tribunal in accordance with the provisions of Article XI of Ordinance No. 7 of the Military Government for Germany (U.S.). Two of the defendants availed themselves of it, one in behalf of himself and the other in behalf of himself and the other ten defendants, and their statements were heard by the Tribunal. The briefs and final pleas of defense counsel consist of more than 1,500 pages, and counsel for the defendants consumed 5 days in final arguments. The briefs and arguments covered every conceivable question of law and fact connected with the case. The closing arguments were made on 30 June 1948, and the case was then taken under consideration.

The following named persons, twelve in number, are the defendants:
 
  Alfried Felix Alwyn Krupp von Bohlen und Halbach
Ewald Oskar Ludwig Loeser
Eduard Houdremont
Erich Mueller
Friedrich Wilhelm Janssen
Karl Heinrich Pfirsch
Max Otto Ihn
Karl Adolf Ferdinand Eberhardt
Heinrich Leo Korschan  

 
1328
Next Page NMT Home Page