. ©MAZAL LIBRARY

NMT09-T1351


. NUERNBERG MILITARY TRIBUNAL
Volume IX · Page 1351
Previous Page Home PageArchive
Table of Contents - Volume 9
become its central office in France. This was to be accomplished by profiting again from the continental wide anti-Jewish policy of the Nazi regime. The property was owned by Société Bacri Frères, a Jewish firm, and had been sequestered by the commissioner for Jewish affairs. The Krupp firm’s representative in Paris, Walter Stein, acting as attorney-in-fact for Krupp Essen, obtained a lease of the property with right to purchase it within 6 months after the date of the lease 1 January 1943 for 2,500,000 francs — not from the rightful owners of the premises but from the provisional administrator of the Société Bacri Frères by virtue of a decision of a commissariat for Jewish questions. This example of the Krupp firm’s exploitation of the Nazi anti-Jewish policy is most objectionable because there was nothing to prevent the firm from honestly leasing or buying a building from a non-Jewish owner in Paris. The records show that on 16 September 1942 defendants Krupp and Loeser approved a loan in the sum of 1,250,000 RM for the establishment of, and loan to, Krupp S.A., Paris.

The correspondence between the Krupp firm and the Paris office shows the avidity of the firm to acquire the Austin factory and the Paris property. Stein, under instructions from Schroeder and defendant Eberhardt, had numerous conferences with German and French officials in an effort to effect the purchases. The French Finance Ministry delayed by raising objections and eventually the change in the military situation prevented the realization of those plans.

In a letter from Schroeder to Krupp employee, Stein, regarding the Paris property, he stated, in part:
 
“ * * * I myself welcome the acquisition, and I can tell you, that Dr. Loeser also approves of it on principle, provided that Dr. Beusch likewise favors the acquisition * * *.”
When the strenuous efforts to purchase the property did not materialize and difficulties arose between Erhard and the Krupp firm, Erhard through the Krupp firm’s influence was dismissed as the provisional administrator and was succeeded in that position by Richard Sandre who was a friend of Krupp employee, Schmidt, mentioned above.

About 6 February 1944 Sandre, the new administrator, called upon Rothschild, the owner, to obtain financial information in order to assess the valuation of the shares of stock of the company. Rothschild had taken along with him all the books of the company containing all the accounting data. Sandre said there was a buyer for the shares and Rothschild knew that the Krupp firm was to be the buyer and that they were already in possession of the property by lease and that they had bought the machines.  

 
1351
Next Page NMT Home Page