. ©MAZAL LIBRARY

NMT09-T1393


. NUERNBERG MILITARY TRIBUNAL
Volume IX · Page 1393
Previous Page Home PageArchive
Table of Contents - Volume 9
again and again while the adjacent camp was hardly ever hit — he told me he could not take the responsibility for rebuilding this camp in the same place. Another camp was prepared, which I visited at that time, which from the point of view of space and in every other respect was without fault. When I told the prisoners of war that they would be transferred to this new camp the spokesman of the French prisoners of war came to me and requested me — I should even say, he entreated me — to leave his fellow prisoners in the camp in the Noeggerathstrasse, although the camp had been completely destroyed. And the unfortunate people lived in the most primitive possible conditions, and his reason was this: Immediately adjacent to the camp there was a railroad shelter with an extremely strong layer of cement on top, and in this railroad underpass which was not open to traffic any more, Krupp had set up a large straw depot, and there the prisoners of war found shelter. The best possible shelter was in this railroad underpass, and they could lie there during the whole night. And that was the reason the spokesman gave me for his fellow prisoners of war wanting to remain at the Noeggerathstrasse camp under those primitive conditions, rather than to move into a new and nicer camp. He told me literally, the ‘railroad tunnel is our life insurance.’ I repeated this to Dr. Lehmann, who immediately stated his willingness to let the prisoners of war stay in Noeggerathstrasse, and to rebuild the camp once more, I believe for the sixth time."
The witness further testified that the Frenchmen volunteered to rebuild the camp themselves and did so. The railway tunnel referred to could accommodate but approximately half the prisoners. The others lived in the plants of the Cast Steel Factory which was a target for increasingly severe air raids.

We do not think that the testimony of Borchmeyer presents a defense to the violation of the obligation of the Krupp firm to furnish adequate air raid protection to the prisoners of war. Quite apart from the fact that it was illegal to employ them at all for war work, and to employ them in so dangerous an area, it was the duty of the employers to see that these prisoners were properly housed and furnished with adequate air raid protection. They were helpless, and in a very real sense they were wards of their masters.

As before said, the Russian prisoners of war began to arrive in Essen in 1942. They were located in Raumerstrasse, Hafenstrasse, and Herderstrasse. A report by Eickmeier to the defendant Lehmann of an inspection of camp Herderstrasse on 13 October 1942 offered in evidence by the defense states among other things (Lehmann 347, Defense Ex. 1146):*
__________
* Reproduced above in section VIII G 1.  
 
1393
Next Page NMT Home Page