. ©MAZAL LIBRARY

NMT09-T1396


. NUERNBERG MILITARY TRIBUNAL
Volume IX · Page 1396
Previous Page Home PageArchive
Table of Contents - Volume 9
In view of this conclusion it is unnecessary to decide in this case whether the Vichy government was legally established according to the requirements of the French constitution.  
 
FOREIGN CIVILIAN WORKERS AND
CONCENTRATION CAMP INMATES 
 
After weighing the evidence the Tribunal finds that the facts on this aspect of the case as summarized by the prosecution have, in essence, been proved.

During the war, Dutch, Belgian, and French workers employed in Germany were referred to as western workers. The Czechs in many ways were treated by the Krupp firm like western workers, although upon some occasions they were subjected to the same mistreatment as so-called eastern workers. Among the western workers, a distinction was made between “free” labor and “convict” labor. The “free” workers were treated better than all of the other classes of labor with which we are concerned here. They had better rations and more liberty. They were, however, not free to leave their work and were also otherwise deprived of many basic rights. The employment of those foreign workers who entered and stayed in the employ of the Krupp organization on a genuinely voluntary basis was, of course, not reprehensible. But an ever increasing majority of the “free workers” were compelled to sign contracts, and if they refused to do so, they were liable to be sent to penal camps. At the end of their contractural period of employment, the “contract” was unilaterally considered renewed. If one of them failed to report for work, he was treated as “slacking,” and also deprived of the small and insufficient food rations. Often, they would be reported to the Gestapo. Those who left their employment with the Krupp firm were charged with “breach of contract” and frequently were sent to a punishment camp maintained by the Gestapo. In the punishment camps, they were treated very badly. Their rations there were the same as those given to eastern workers. They were confined behind barbed wire; their movements were severely restricted; they were beaten frequently; and the distances they were required to walk to and from work were long. They were mistreated in many other respects, such as being denied packages and letters, forbidden to attend religious services, and given no pay.

Until the spring of 1942, only certain groups of so-called western workers were actually compelled to go into Germany. At that time, Sauckel’s Labor Mobilization Program became effective, and  

 
1396
Next Page NMT Home Page