. ©MAZAL LIBRARY

NMT09-T1456


. NUERNBERG MILITARY TRIBUNAL
Volume IX · Page 1456
Previous Page Home PageArchive
Table of Contents - Volume 9
by the Creditanstalt Bank. Because of the relentless pressure against Austria by Germany, relations between these two countries were poor prior to 1938 and neither the Austrian Creditanstalt Bank nor the Austrian State wanted foreigners to obtain any shares of Berndorfer.

As early as February 1937, more than a year before the seizure of Austria, Gustav Krupp’s brother-in-law, Mr. von Wilmowsky, wrote a letter to Gustav stating that Lammers, State Secretary in Hitler’s Reich Chancellery, had been advised of Gustav’s desire for an interview with Hitler about the possibility of acquiring Austrian shares. The request was made that the audience take place as soon as possible as Gustav was anxious to have the matter settled and that the Fuehrer had promised to see him.

On 12 March 1938 German troops invaded Austria, and on the 13th a law was passed for the absorption of Austria within the German Reich. On 19 March 1938 a decree was issued by the Reich Minister of Economics prohibiting, under threat of fine and imprisonment, any German business concern from establishing subsidiary companies in Austria or acquiring by purchase Austrian business concerns except by special exception by the Reich Ministry of Economics. It may be said that this decree was issued, not in order to prevent the infiltration of the Austrian economy by Germany but to channelize that infiltration in a manner commensurate with the wishes of the Nazi government.

Three other German concerns were endeavoring to obtain an interest in the Berndorfer plant but their efforts brought no success as Goering had promised Gustav Krupp that the Krupp concern could have the exclusive right to purchase the Bank’s controlling interest in Berndorfer.

I quote from another letter addressed to Gustav Krupp by his brother-in-law, Mr. von Wilmowsky, dated 19 April 1938. Mr. von Wilmowsky was a member of the Aufsichtsrat of the Krupp firm. His letter is particularly enlightening as it illustrates, I think, the political manœuverings to which the Krupp firm resorted in this instance to accomplish its purpose (NI-770, Pros. Ex. 1278):
 
“I arrived in Vienna this morning and am leaving for Berndorf tonight * * *. I heard the following:

“Mr. Hamburger’s dismissal is definite. At the instigation of the Creditanstalt, a university lecturer Schmied from Danzig, an Austrian, has been appointed provisional supervisor in addition to the Betriebsfuehrer (plant manager) Kern. Mr. Kern had, hitherto, been in charge of commercial problems, however, he lacks insight where the management of the entire plant is concerned and does not possess the necessary authority.  

 
1456
Next Page NMT Home Page