. ©MAZAL LIBRARY

NMT09-T1471


. NUERNBERG MILITARY TRIBUNAL
Volume IX · Page 1471
Previous Page Home PageArchive
Table of Contents - Volume 9
ore mining department at the time of the acquisition of these mining properties in France and Yugoslavia. In fact, this department worked closely with the finance department on all matters relating to the acquisition and exploitation of mineral resources. Reports on the activities of the Krupp firm in this field were distributed to defendants Houdremont, Mueller, and Janssen. After April 1943 Fritz Mueller, who is now deceased, was the Vorstand member directly in charge of ore mining, but matters of policy and acquisition of properties required the approval of the other members of the inner Vorstand; namely, defendants Krupp, Houdremont, Mueller, and Janssen.

The activities of the Krupp firm in Yugoslavia which I have just reviewed clearly violated the laws and customs of war and more particularly Articles 43 and 46 of the Hague Regulations. The expropriation of mines in Yugolavia [sic] was not supported by any concern for the needs of public order and safety or by the needs of the occupation. The Krupp firm took the initiative in seeking to participate in the exploitation of the seized property, even urging the government to expropriate properties. It leased the Jeserina mine from the government authorities with knowledge of their illegal expropriation. The seizure of the Asseo shares based upon the anti-Jewish laws was illegal and subsequent dealings by the Krupp firm with knowledge of the illegality was likewise illegal.
 
RUSSIA 
 
At the time of the attack on Soviet Russia on 22 June 1941 the Reich government issued a directive concerning the administration of the territories to be occupied which stated, in part:  
 
“The regulations of the Hague Convention on Land Warfare which concern the administration of a country occupied by a foreign belligerent power are not applicable, since the U.S.S.R. is to be considered dissolved, and therefore the Reich has the obligation of exercising all governmental and other sovereign functions in the interest of the country’s inhabitants. Therefore, any measures are permitted which the German administration decrees necessary and suitable for the execution of this comprehensive plan.”
This policy, that the Hague Conventions were not applicable at all in Russia, was openly proclaimed and there was no attempt to keep it secret nor to comply with the requirements of international law. A decree was issued for the clarification of doubtful questions which arose “in connection with the discovery, seizure, securing,

 
1471
Next Page NMT Home Page