. ©MAZAL LIBRARY

NMT09-T1485


. NUERNBERG MILITARY TRIBUNAL
Volume IX · Page 1485
Previous Page Home PageArchive
Table of Contents - Volume 9
XIV. CONFIRMATION AND REVISION OF THE SENTENCES BY THE MILITARY GOVERNOR OF THE UNITED STATES ZONE OF OCCUPATION¹
 
A. Introduction  
 
Under Articles XV and XVII of Ordnance No. 7, the sentences imposed by the Tribunal are subject to review by the Military Governor. On 1 April 1949, General Lucius D. Clay, Military Governor of the United States Zone of Occupation, confirmed by separate orders the sentences for a term of years imposed upon the defendants von Buelow, Eberhardt, Houdremont, Ihn, Janssen, Korschan, Alfried Krupp, Kupke, Lehmann, Loeser, and Mueller. However, in the order concerning the sentence imposed on the defendant Alfried Krupp, the Military Governor altered the provision of the sentence concerning the forfeiture and confiscation of property. The provision of the sentence reading:  
 
" * * * and orders forfeiture of all your property, both real and personal. The same shall be delivered to the Control Council for Germany and disposed of in accordance with the provisions of Article II, Section 3 of Control Council Law No. 10."
was changed to read: 
 
"All property * * * on 31 July 1948 [the day of the Tribunal’s judgment and sentence] is ordered and declared to be subject to forfeiture and confiscation by the Zone Commander of the Area of Control in which the same was then located * * * ."
The order of the Military Governor confirming and revising the sentence imposed on the defendant Alfried Krupp is reproduced below in section B. The order confirming the sentence for a term of years imposed on defendant von Buelow is reproduced below in section C. The orders confirming the other sentences for a term of years were similar to the order confirming the sentence imposed on the defendant von Buelow.²
__________
¹ Counsel for all the defendants who had been sentenced addressed petitions to the Military Governor requesting that the sentences be set aside or modified. The prosecution, following its previous practice, filed no reply or answer to these defense petitions. However, with leave of the Military Governor, a “Memorandum in Support of Affirmance of Property Confiscation Decree,” 28 February 1949. was submitted by the Honorable James E. Murray on behalf of himself and other United States Senators. In connection with this memorandum, Mr. Joseph W. Kaufman, formerly deputy chief counsel for the Krupp trial, acted as counsel.

² At the time this volume was nearing completion, further action on these sentences was taken by the United States High Commissioner for Germany. His decision upon review of these sentences will he included in section XXV, volume XV, this series.
 
 
1485
Next Page NMT Home Page