| . |
"The second point of advice is to use
utmost restraint, at least until the political atmosphere here in this
country shall have improved, and scientific theories concerning
heredity and race can no longer be abused for political purposes.
Because, if the discussion about sterilization today is carried into
the arena of political contest, then pretty soon we will no longer
hear about the mentally sick but, instead, about Aryans and
non-Aryans, about the blonde Germanic race and about inferior people
with round skulls. That anything useful could come from that is
certainly improbable; but science in general and genealogy and
eugenics in particular would suffer an injury which could not easily
be repaired again." I said
at the outset of this statement that the Third Reich died of its own
poison. This case is a striking demonstration not only of the tremendous
degradation of German medical ethics which Nazi doctrine brought about,
but of the undermining of the medical art and thwarting of the
techniques which the defendants sought to employ. The Nazis have, to a
certain extent, succeeded in convincing the peoples of the world that
the Nazi system, although ruthless, was absolutely efficient; that
although savage, it was completely scientific; that although entirely
devoid of humanity, it was highly systematic that "it got
things done." The evidence which this Tribunal will hear will
explode this myth. The Nazi methods of investigation were inefficient
and unscientific, and their techniques of research were unsystematic.
These experiments revealed nothing which civilized medicine can use. It
was, indeed, ascertained that phenol or gasoline injected intravenously
will kill a man inexpensively and within 60 seconds. This and a few
other "advances" are all in the field of thanatology. There is
no doubt that a number of these new methods may be useful to criminals
everywhere and there is no doubt that they may be useful to a criminal
state. Certain advance in destructive methodology we cannot deny, and
indeed from Himmler's standpoint this may well have been the principal
objective.
Apart from these deadly fruits, the experiments were not only criminal
but a scientific failure. It is indeed as if a just deity had shrouded
the solutions which they attempted to reach with murderous means. The
moral shortcomings of the defendants and the precipitous ease with which
they decided to commit murder in quest of "scientific results",
dulled also that scientific hesitancy, that thorough thinking-through,
that responsible weighing of every single step which alone can insure
scientifically valid results. Even if they had merely been forced to pay
as little as, two dollars for human experimental subjects, such as
American investigators may have to pay for a cat, they might have
thought twice before wasting unnecessary numbers, and thought of simpler
and better ways to solve their problems. The
73 |