| . |
the authority to intervene at any
time. Weltz' actions throughout the entire development of the plans for
the experiments were not merely negative. He was in full accord with the
entire enterprise and he realized that Rascher did not possess the
necessary qualifications to conduct these experiments without the
assistance of a specialist in this particular field of aviation
medicine. Furthermore, although Rascher was attached to Weltz' Institute
he had no other definite work. (Tr. pp 7078 and 7187.) To find a
specialist to collaborate with Weltz and Rascher proved to be a
difficult task. Weltz first approached members of his own institute,
namely Lutz and Wendt, men of considerable reputation in this field, but
to no avail. Wolfgang Lutz appeared before this Tribunal and testified
that Weltz requested his assistance, as well as the assistance of Wendt,
but that they both refused on moral grounds. (Tr. p. 269.) Weltz
did not deny this, but contended that his questions to Lutz were purely
rhetorical. (Tr. p. 7069.)
The inability to interest a specialist in the field of high-altitude
research to collaborate with Rascher explains the cause for the lapse of
time between the date of the authorization by Himmler and the actual
date of the commencement of the experiments, viz, July 1941 to February
1942. Weltz was not a specialist in high-altitude research. Kottenhoff
was transferred to Romania, and Rascher was comparatively a novice in
this field.
The next step taken by Weltz, which led to the completion of the plans
to conduct the high-altitude experiments on human beings, at the Dachau
concentration camp, was his invitation to the defendants Ruff and
Romberg to collaborate with Rascher. These two men were experts in this
field and were interested in further research in altitudes exceeding
12,000 meters. Weltz testified that he made a trip to Berlin and that
Ruff accepted his invitation to collaborate with Rascher. (Tr. p.
7188.) The evidence shows that Weltz approached Ruff and Romberg as
he needed expert assistance. (NO-437, Pros. Ex. 42; NO-263,
Pros. Ex. 47; NO-191, Pros. Ex. 43.) The
defendant Ruff stated that he first heard of the plan to carry out
research on inmates of the Dachau concentration camp from the defendant
Weltz and that Weltz desired collaboration between Romberg and Rascher
and between Weltz' Institute and Ruff's Institute. (Tr. p. 6653.)
Furthermore, Ruff testified that Weltz stated:
"It is, of course, best if you or
Romberg take part in these experiments because Romberg had already
carried out such parachute descent experiments and is therefore the
man who knows about the whole problem of rescue from high altitudes."
(Tr. pp. 6654-5.) Ruff further testified that Weltz suggested
that a new series of experiments in parachute descents from great
heights should be carried out at Dachau on prisoners. (Tr. p. 6653.)
94 |