| . |
preparations were to be made for
1944-45. These experiments, however, were never carried out because
Rascher was already arrested in the spring of 1944
Q. In that case you are saying that these dry-cold experiments were not
carried out in the mountains in the winter of 1943-44. You assisted in
preventing these experiments from being carried out by delaying the
finding of suitable accommodation?
A. Yes.
Q. I will now briefly summarize your testimony with reference to the
count concerning cold experiments.
Mr. HARDY: If it please your Honor, the defense counsel has put
questions to the witness and the witness has testified to these
questions. I really think summations after each experiment are
unnecessary here That can take place in his closing statement.
PRESIDING JUDGE BEALS: A short summation on the part of defense counsel
might be in order, as long as it does not contain too much repetition.
Dr. WEISGERBER: Yes, your Honor. You accidentally attended the
completion of a cold experiment by Dr. Rascher at Dachau. You had seen
no reports about Dr. Rascher's experiments and received no knowledge
about them in any other way. The furnishing of the experimental subjects
for the rewarming experiments were not your business, and you actually
had nothing to do with it. You attended a further experiment under the
circumstances which you have previously described. You know nothing
about any dry-cold experiments being carried out in Dachau itself. You
succeeded in delaying and finally completely frustrating the dry-cold
experiments in the mountains. Is that correct?
DEFENDANT SIEVERS: Yes, that is correct.
Q. After searching your mind, did you do anything in that connection
which went beyond the orders given you by Himmler?
A. No, in no way at all.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
3. MALARIA EXPERIMENTS
a. Introduction
The defendants Karl Brandt, Handloser, Rostock, Gebhardt, Blome, Rudolf
Brandt, Mrugowsky, Poppendick, and Sievers were charged with special
responsibility for and participation in criminal conduct involving
malaria experiments (par. 6 (C) of the indictment). Only the defendant
Sievers was convicted on this charge. In the case Of the defendant
Mrugowsky the judgment of the Tribunal makes no special reference to
this charge.
278 |