NMT01-T631
Volume I · Page 631
during the incubation period, a transport also containing sick people, 13 became sick in the period from 29 May to 9 June; of those, two died."
Then it continues to give the titer value of some of the others. Professor, don't you have to change your testimony about vaccination in Natzweiler?
A. No. I cannot change it. I know nothing about this.
Q. Professor, let us look at words "together with S". What do you understand "together with S" to mean? It is 26 May 1944?
A. I have no idea what "S" means.
Q. You testified that the defendant Schroeder visited you and you fixed the date, 25 May 1944. Is there any possibility that that "S" could mean Schroeder?
A. No. That is quite impossible. Impossible. Professor Schroeder never carried out any experiments with me nor did any work in my laboratory. He was not with me in Schirmeck or Natzweiler.
Q. He was not with you in Natzweiler?
A. No.
The defendants Genzken, Gebhardt, Mrugowsky, and Poppendick were charged with special responsibility for and participation in criminal conduct involving experiments with poison (par. 6 (K) of the indictment). Only the defendant Mrugowsky was convicted on this charge.
The prosecution's summation of the evidence on the experiments with poison is contained in its closing brief against the, defendant Mrugowsky. An extract from this brief is set forth below on pages 631 to 632. A corresponding summation of the evidence by the defense on these experiments has been selected from the final plea for the defendant Mrugowsky. It appears below on pages 633 to 634. This argumentation is followed by selections from the evidence on pages 634 to 639.
Poison experiments were carried out in the Buchenwald and Sachsenhausen concentration camps by order of the defendant Mrugowsky
