| |
in every possible manner and made him gifts of furniture,
underwear, and food. There were periods in which complete workshops were
erected for Hoven in which thirty or more inmates were working.
Pieter Schalker testified before the Dutch Bureau for the
Investigation of War Crimes in Amsterdam that Hoven played an exceptionally
evil role and had innumerable deaths on his conscience owing to completely
inadequate medical attention. In later years, when it became obvious that
Germany would be defeated, he changed his attitude towards the inmates.
(NO-1063, Pros. Ex. 328.) When Schalker was interrogated by the
commissioner of the Tribunal on the motion of defense counsel, he amplified his
statement by saying that Hoven stole the food which was furnished for the
experimental subjects in Block 46 and also obtained other items such as shoes,
toys, and women's clothing.
The testimony of the affiant Ackermann, who was an inmate in
the pathological department under Hoven, proves that Hoven participated in the
customary brutal crimes in concentration camps. He said
"Dr. Hoven stood once together with me at the
window of the pathological section and pointed to a prisoner, not known to me,
who crossed the place where the roll calls were held. Dr. Hoven said to me: `I
want to see the skull of this prisoner on my writing desk by tomorrow evening.'
The prisoner was ordered to report to the medical section, after the physician
had noted down the number of the prisoner. The corpse was delivered on the same
day to the dissection room. The postmortem examination showed that the prisoner
had been killed by injections. The skull was prepared as ordered and delivered
to Dr. Hoven." (NO-2631, Pros. Ex. 522.)
Hoven also approved the beating of concentration camp inmates.
(NO-2313, Pros. Ex. 523; NO-2312, Pros. Ex. 524.) One of these inmates
died. On 20 August 1942, Hoven suggested to the camp commander of Buchenwald
that the reporting of deaths of Russian political prisoners be discontinued in
order to save paper. He said "It
is requested that the question should be examined whether it is necessary to
issue reports of the death of political Russians. According to a direction
issued last week, an issue of only one form was required. This may effect a
saving of paper, but as political Russians are for the greatest number among
the dead prisoners at the present time, more time and paper
3
|