| |
| The sufficiency of count one of the
indictment was challenged by the defendants upon jurisdictional grounds, and on
11 July 1947, the Tribunal made and entered the following
order: |
| |
"Count one of the indictment in
this case charges that the defendants, acting pursuant to a common design,
unlawfully, willfully and knowingly did conspire and agree together to commit
war crimes and crimes against humanity as defined in Control Council Law No.
10, article II. It is charged that the alleged crime was committed between
January 1933 and April 1945.
"It is the ruling of this Tribunal that
neither the Charter of the International Military Tribunal nor Control Council
Law No. 10 has defined conspiracy to commit a war crime or crime against
humanity as a separate substantive crime; therefore, this Tribunal has no
jurisdiction to try any defendant upon a charge of conspiracy considered as a
separate substantive offense.
"Count one of the indictment, in addition
to the separate charge of conspiracy, also alleged unlawful participation in
the formulation and execution of plans to commit war crimes and crimes against
humanity which actually involved the commission of such crimes. We, therefore,
cannot properly strike the whole of count one from the indictment, but, in so
far as count one charges the commission of the alleged crime of conspiracy as a
separate substantive offense, distinct from any war crime or crime against
humanity, the Tribunal will disregard that charge.
"This ruling must
not be construed as limiting the force or effect of article II, paragraph 2, of
Control Council Law No. 10, or as denying to either prosecution or defense the
right to offer in evidence any facts or circumstances occurring either before
or after September 1939, if such facts or circumstances tend to prove or to
disprove the commission by any defendant of war crimes or crimes against
humanity as defined in Control Council Law No.
10." |
| |
| THE JURISDICTIONAL
ENACTMENTS |
| |
| For convenient reference we have attached to
this opinion copies of the London Agreement of 8 August 1945, with the Charter
of the International Military Tribunal annexed thereto, Control Council Law No.
10, Military Government Ordinance No. 7, and the indictment, which are marked
respectively Exhibits A, B, C, and D.* |
__________ * All the documents referred
to are reproduced in the preface portion of this volume and are not reproduced
as a part of this judgment. See Table of Contents
956 |