| |
| Pursuant to a decree of the Fuehrer of 16
March 1939, the defendant Schlegelberger, as Reich Minister of Justice in
charge, together with the Minister of the Interior and the Chief of the Armed
Forces, Keitel, issued a decree which reads in part as follows:
|
| |
"Section 1. In case of direct
attack by a non-German citizen against the SS or the German Police or against
any of their members, the Reich Leader of the SS and the Chief of the German
Police in the Reich Ministry of the Interior may establish the ,jurisdiction of
a combined SS court and police court, by declaring that special interests of
parts of the SS or of the Police require that judgment be given by an SS and
police court.
"This declaration shall be sent to the Reich Protector of
Bohemia and Moravia. The SS and police court, which shall have jurisdiction in
individual cases, shall be specified by the Reich Leader of the SS and Chief of
the German Police in the Reich Ministry of the Interior.
"Section 2. If
the offense directly injures the interests of the armed forces, the Reich
Leader of the SS and chief of the German Police in the Reich Ministry of the
Interior, and the chief of the Supreme Command of the Armed Forces shall reach
an agreement as to whether the case shall be prosecuted by an SS and police
court or by a military court.¹
"Article II. Exemption of the Reich
court from being bound to precedent sentence: The Reich Court as the highest
German tribunal must consider it its duty to effect an interpretation of the
law which takes into account the change of ideology and of legal concepts which
the new State has brought about. In order to be able to accomplish this task
without having to show consideration for the jurisdiction of the past brought
about by other ideology and other legal concepts, it is ruled as follows:
"When a decision is made about a legal question, the Reich Court can
deviate from a decision laid down before this law went into
effect."² |
| |
| THE LAW IN
ACTION |
| |
| We pass now from the foregoing incomplete
summary of Nazi legislation to a consideration of the law in action, and of the
influence of the "Fuehrer principle" as it affected the officials of the
Ministry of Justice, prosecutors, and judges. Two basic principles controlled
conduct within the Ministry of Justice. The first concerned the absolute power
of Hitler in person or by delegated authority to enact, enforce, and adjudicate
law. The second con- [...cerned] |
__________ ¹ 1942 RGB1. I, p. 475.
² Law of 28 June 1935; 1935 RGB1. I, p. 844.
1010 |