. ©MAZAL LIBRARY

NMT07-T0318


. NUERNBERG MILITARY TRIBUNAL
Volume VII · Page 318
Previous Page Home PageArchive
Table of Contents - Volume 7
entering with the troops found nothing objectionable, that the foreign workers had no complaints to make to the Americans in reply to their pressing questions, and that, in some works, the foreigners handed in letters of thanks before their departure.

Before I conclude these statements, I should like to draw the attention of the Court to the following point:

As I emphasized in the beginning, the Bitterfeld Works lies now in the Zone of Germany occupied by the Soviet Union. It has become evident, not only in my own defense presentation, but also in that of my colleagues, whose clients were directors of works [now] in the Soviet Zone, that the obtaining of defense material from this zone meets with extraordinary difficulties. It is not only true that the witnesses concerned are afraid of getting into political difficulties if they give their former works managers a truthful affidavit concerning events of the war and prewar period — which fears, according to experience, do not beset the witnesses in the Western Zones; but it is also a fact that documentary material cannot (or only with the greatest difficulty and to the most limited extent), be obtained from the works of the Eastern Zone, which — like Bitterfeld — in every respect have become Soviet government plants. I beg the High Tribunal, in the assessment of the evidence of the defense, to take this point of view into consideration — and not to let the defendants who directed plants in the Eastern Zone suffer for these excessive difficulties in the procurement of evidence.  
 
R. Opening Statement for Defendant Ilgner*  
 
DR. NATH (counsel for defendant Ilgner) : May it please the Court. The prosecution has endeavored to prove to the Court that my client, Dr. Max Ilgner, is allegedly guilty of count one of the indictment; namely the planning, preparation, and waging of a war of aggression, because allegedly he carried on espionage and propaganda activities in preparation of war, as head of the IG office which was in Berlin and is known by the name of "Berlin NW 7."

In this connection, the prosecution names the Economic Research Department (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung), the Political-Economic Policy Department (Wirtschaftspolitische Abteilung) both of which functioned in the office Berlin NW 7; it points to the IG liaison men [Verbindungsmaenner] who were
__________
* Tr. [pages 4866-4877 19 December 1947. The final statement of defendant Ilgner to the Tribunal appears in section XI 8, volume VIII, this series.  



318
Next Page NMT Home Page