. ©MAZAL LIBRARY

NMT07-T0739


. NUERNBERG MILITARY TRIBUNAL
Volume VII · Page 739
Previous Page Home PageArchive
Table of Contents - Volume 7
whether my collaborators might not [occasionally] call it to his attention when some of our leading gentlemen abroad came to Germany for a vacation, as he would be interested to talk to some of them, to which I agreed."

A. Do you mean the statement I made, where I said quite clearly a little further, "I don't know, however, whether Major Bloch"? —

Q. I direct your attention to a particular paragraph and ask you, is this your language appearing in that paragraph, "Major Bloch asked me whether my collaborators might not [occasionally] call it to his attention when some of our leading gentlemen abroad came to Germany for a vacation, as he would be interested to talk to some of them, to which I agreed."

A. Yes, that is completely correct, but you have to read further, then it becomes clear.

PRESIDING JUDGE SHAKE: Counsel, under the practice that this Tribunal has adopted, when a document is submitted to you, it is thereafter available to you, and if, after consultation, you find other parts you want the Tribunal to take into consideration, you will have that opportunity.

DEFENDANT ILGNER: Thank you.
 
c. Testimony of Defendant Schneider 
 
EXTRACTS FROM THE TESTIMONY OF
DEFENDANT SCHNEIDER¹ 
 
DIRECT EXAMINATION 
 
* * * * * * * * * *  
 
DR. HELLMUTH DIX (counsel for defendant Schneider): I now turn to the paragraph entitled, "Counterintelligence" [Abwehr], in which the prosecution charges you with the intelligence work of Farben, together with OKW. You became main counterintelligence delegate [Hauptabwehrbeauftragter] of Farben in 1940, so that the prewar years are insignificant for your activity in regard to this particular charge of the prosecution in regard to preparations for a war of aggression.

In book 8, I offered Schneider Defense Exhibits 23 through 27 in regard to this problem. One of them, Exhibit 25,² is an exhibit of the prosecution — a document of the prosecution which was not offered, and which the prosecution was kind enough to make available to me.
__________
¹ Complete testimony recorded in mimeographed transcript, 18, 19, 20, 24 February 1948, pp. 7121-7524
² This exhibit, (NI-10422), an affidavit by Albrecht Pock, is not reproduced herein. The affidavit was obtained originally by an interrogator of the prosecution, but the prosecution dill not offer it in evidence.  




739
Next Page NMT Home Page