. ©MAZAL LIBRARY

NMT08-T0718


. NUERNBERG MILITARY TRIBUNAL
Volume VIII · Page 718
Previous Page Home PageArchive
Table of Contents - Volume 8
Your Honor, is this exhibit before the Tribunal? NI-14169, Exhibit 1877.

PRESIDING JUDGE SHAKE: No, it is not.

DR. BERNDT: In that case, Dr. ter Meer, I think it would be better if you read the first paragraph of the letter to the Tribunal. Otherwise your explanation would not be understood.

A. This paragraph reads, and I quote:  
 
“This question is, of course, of immediate interest and Dr. Ambros, particularly is asking for assistance for Auschwitz. I had promised the latter that I would find out as soon as I arrived here how the matter stands and that I would report about it. Unfortunately, I am not able to do this at this moment since no final decision has yet been made about the recruitment of chemical workers. The Referent concerned of the G. B. A. (that is the Plenipotentiary General for Labor Allocation) with the Staff for Rearmament and War production and Lt. Colonel Kirschner and Dr. Deichmann are trying to issue a final decree about the compulsory recruitment of chemical workers during the course of this week. As soon as the wording of this decree is definite, I will see that you get a copy of it. I myself have up to today, not yet been able to contact time three persons mentioned above. Perhaps you could telephone Messrs. Wurster and Ambros to give them this provisional information.” 
Q. Now, will you please explain this paragraph which you just read?

A. Yes. The matter is quite clear. Around that time March — l944 — a regulation was pending regarding the recruitment of chemical workers from Italy. Responsible for this regulation was the representative for labor allocation with the staff of General Leyers. He and Lieutenant Colonel Kirschner and Dr. Deichmann wanted to issue a final decree about the recruitment of chemical workers as soon as possible. I myself had nothing at all to do with this matter. With respect to the chemical plants which I was concerned with, I rejected any interference regarding workers. But since there were other chemical enterprises in Upper Italy aside from time ones with which I was concerned, and from which, alone, labor could be drawn off, we had to take into consideration that Italian chemical workers would go into Germany. Since I knew the scarcity of labor prevailing in Germany, I promised Mr. Wurster and Ambros before going to Italy in March or at the end of February, “as soon as any settlement has been made I shall inform you of it.” This letter said “no settlement has yet been made and I can, therefore, give you no information as yet.”

Q. Very well. Can you say anything else regarding the further contents of this letter?

 
718
Next Page NMT Home Page