. ©MAZAL LIBRARY

NMT08-T0719


. NUERNBERG MILITARY TRIBUNAL
Volume VIII · Page 719
Previous Page Home PageArchive
Table of Contents - Volume 8
A. No. The other part of this letter deals with questions which have nothing to do with foreign workers and the procurement of labor for Germany.

Q. I think we can leave it at that. 
 
* * * * * * * * * * 
 
3. TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANT SCHNEIDER 
 
EXTRACTS FROM THE TESTIMONY OF
DEFENDANT SCHNEIDER* 
 
DIRECT EXAMINATION 
 
* * * * * * * * * * 
 
DR. HEILMUTH DIX (counsel for defendant Schneider): * * * From what period on Mr. Schneider, were you main plant leader of Farben?

DEFENDANT SCHNEIDER: From 1938 on until the end of the war, as Professor Selck's successor, who had held this position since 1934.

Q. Can you tell me quite briefly what the character of your position was?

A. According to the law regulating national labor, in a stock corporation [Aktiengesellschaft], the Vorstand represented the position of the owner and the leader of the enterprise. If he did not work in the plant itself, for instance if he resided in another locality, the Vorstand had to delegate a person as leader of the enterprise. If the Vorstand consisted of several persons, then it had to single out one member to exercise the function of the leader of the enterprise. If the corporation consisted of several plants in different localities, then the Vorstand also had to appoint one deputy from among its ranks who would be the leader of the entire enterprise. In Farben, that was the person of the main plant leader.

Q. Is this term “main plant leader” mentioned in the law?

A. No. It was probably chosen as a parallel to the main plant cell obmann, [Hauptbereiebszellenobmann (chairman of a factory cell)], the man appointed by the German Labor Front for large enterprises with several plants.

Q. What other position (lid you hold in your capacity as main plant leader?

A. I was also the head of the Enterprise Council [Unternehmensbeirat].

Q. For what reason was this Enterprise Council formed?

A. According to the law regulating national labor, in enterprises with various plants, an advisory body representing the employees had to be created to advise the entrepreneur on social welfare questions.
__________
* Further extracts from the testimony of the defendant Schneider are reproduced earlier in subsections VII C 5c, D 4c, I 7b, volume VII, this series, and below in subsection G 8.
 
719
Next Page NMT Home Page