. ©MAZAL LIBRARY

NMT08-T0760


. NUERNBERG MILITARY TRIBUNAL
Volume VIII · Page 760
Previous Page Home PageArchive
Table of Contents - Volume 8
PRESIDING JUDGE SHAKE: May I interrupt a moment, Doctor? Please answer the questions as you can and if it serves any other purposes, let your counsel ask about it. I don't know the document.

Q. Thank you. Dr. Ambros, do you recall whether on occasions the subconstruction companies answered that it was impossible to increase work performance of their inmates standard set by your construction company? Do you recall receiving such letters?

A. Prosecutor, you are asking me a question, to try to explain the relations between a construction firm and the inmates, that is impossible for me to answer. I tell you again, this Luranil firm is a construction firm and not a building firm. They don’t have a foreman, they don’t have workers. The Luranil has designers and accountants, they make the designs and the blueprints. Therefore, I can't answer your question.

Q. Dr. Ambros, I show you Documents NI-14297 and NI-14294, offered as Prosecution Exhibits 1930 and 1931* respectively, and ask you whether either of the two refresh your recollection as to whether the subconstruction firms wrote to your firm that the standards set were impossible to be carried out?

PRESIDING JUDGE SHAKE: Dr. Ambros, that is a simple question as to whether you know anything about this letter having been written.

A. I know neither the document nor the contents contained in your question.

Q. Thank you. Dr. Ambros, you testified yesterday — no, the last court day, that you were taken in by the façade at Auschwitz. Now, you visited I. G. Auschwitz, according to your testimony, on approximately 18 separate occasions, and on each occasion, remained 1 or 2 or 3 days. Now, was this same false front put up to deceive you on each one of those visits?

A. I used that concept of a façade when I spoke of the concentration camp at Auschwitz, in connection with my visit of April 7, 1941, and then I said that this impression I gained of the façade — I used the word Potemkin village — was repeated during my second visit of 16 October 1941, and that my last visit was 2 or 4 weeks later, I think on the 15th of November 1941. In other words, I always refer to the concentration camp of Auschwitz, and that was my last visit to the concentration camp of Auschwitz.

Q. I understood that. Now, I am referring to IG Auschwitz, in your various visits to the I. G. Farben construction site at Auschwitz. All those times you visited IG Auschwitz, were things continued to be kept from you, or did you have access to what was happening in IG Auschwitz? Let me ask a specific question and make it simpler. Dr. Ambros, observing the appearance of the inmates on the oc- [...casions]
__________
* Reproduced above in subsection IX D.  
 
760
Next Page NMT Home Page