. ©MAZAL LIBRARY

NMT09-T0349


. NUERNBERG MILITARY TRIBUNAL
Volume IX · Page 349
Previous Page Home PageArchive
Table of Contents - Volume 9
the first piece of the new large equipment and for the renewed interest which is expressed for the firm of Krupp once more.

In enclosure 1 you will find the basic ideas for the social foundation of the firm of Krupp into which the amounts realized from the sale of this equipment are to be transmitted. In this connection I started from the idea that the firm of Krupp should create something which exceeds the compass of the normal care for the social welfare of the working staff. As you are aware, the normal care for the social welfare has already been developed to a great extent in our firm, and will be taken care of by the Party and the State more and more in the future. But, with respect to the engineering problems which the firm of Krupp had to solve so far, and which, I hope, will be entrusted to this firm also in the future, I believe that the promotion of the intellectual and technical talents of the workers and of their craftsmanship will remain a further social claim to which especially the staff of Krupp is entitled.

The more the knowledge of the individual member of the staff is developed, the more he will be conscious of his value to the community of the people. But the furtherance of his craftsmanship is only possible if he remains in the closest touch with the manufacturing enterprise. The higher the knowledge of the workers is developed, the better the quality of the products of the plant will be. The planned foundation of a kind of company owned training place for the workers, for which my collaborators suggested the name of “Gustav-Haus,” shall serve this idea in the widest sense of the word.

Furthermore — with special reference to my personal letter attached hereto — I should like to refer once more to the further contents of your conversation with my son at the Fuehrer Headquarters on which he has reported to me. You have asked me to make proposals to you which would secure the future of the unified existence of the Krupp works more than this is feasible today. In the enclosure 2 you will find a few thoughts which, to make them more easily understandable and under the assumption that the firm of Krupp is not the only one which has similar wishes for future safeguarding, I have shaped in the form of a draft law. The basic thoughts behind the law are easily discernible from the introduction. On considering this question we have ascertained that under the present laws the principal solution of the question cannot be carried out. We had to find an entirely new way, therefore, which, just as the law regarding heritage of agricultural property, creates entirely new legislation.

Should there still be any questions concerning the fundamental ideas of the draft of the law, I shall always be at your disposal  

 
349
Next Page NMT Home Page