. ©MAZAL LIBRARY

NMT09-T0617


. NUERNBERG MILITARY TRIBUNAL
Volume IX · Page 617
Previous Page Home PageArchive
Table of Contents - Volume 9
acted as a commissioner. The commissioners during the period from 1940 up to spring 1943 switched the production of the firm to a great extent to the manufacture of war material. For this war material production, large purchases of machines were made by the commissioners. The firm headed by the commissioners went under the name of “ELMAG Elsaessische Maschinenbau A.G.” and was a legal entity according to the German laws in force since 1940.

During the lease negotiations with the firm of Krupp, therefore, the two commissioners and the Chief of the Civil Administration appeared in Strasbourg as legal representatives of the ELMAG A.G. A special company was founded by the Friedrich Krupp firm for the purposes of leasing and managing the firm in Mulhouse and this was given the name of “ELMAG Werke Elsass Maschinenbau G.m.b.H.” (ELMAG G.m.b.H). This explains why the preliminary agreement on the lease arrangement dated 31 March 1943* was concluded by the Chief of the Civil Administration on the one hand and the firm of Fried. Krupp on the other while the final lease contract dated 5 July 1944 was concluded by four signatories, namely the Chief of the Civil Administration in Alsace and the ELMAG A.G. as lessor, while the ELMAG G.m.b.H. and the firm Fried. Krupp were named as leaseholders.

There were no doubts as to the right of the Chief of the Civil Administration and of the commissioners appointed by him to conclude such a lease agreement.

The negotiations for the lease agreement were very lengthy, particularly because the provisional administrator of the ELMAG A.G., Mr. Dalmer, thanks to his very secure political position, was able to enforce his wishes very energetically. This was especially evident during the fixing of the lease price. In this I personally held the point of view that only a lease price of 1.3 million Reichsmarks per annum was warrantable. Mr. Eberhardt, who conducted the negotiations, however, very generously met Mr. Dalmer’s demands and agreed to a lease price of 2.5 million Reichsmarks. Mr. Habermaas, at that time director of the ELMAG G.m.b.H., intimated to Mr. Eberhardt his refusal to accept the responsibility for this extraordinarily high lease price, and I recall that he told him at the time — “If so much rent is to be paid, do not expect profits from me.”

In the course of the negotiations it soon became obvious that Mr. Dalmer wanted to gain something for himself personally; therefore, finally, a very generous payment of 50,000 Reichsmarks for Mr. Dalmer was included in the lease agreement.

The lease agreement included the whole enterprise of the ELMAG A.G. in the Alsace (excluding the enterprise at Grafen- […staden]
__________
* Document Document NIK-6254, Prosecution Exhibit 1804, reproduced above in this section.  
 
617
Next Page NMT Home Page